A small number of diligent people is rooting around scientific records for suspicious data in clinical research. Anaesthetist for England’s National Health Service John Carlisle is one of them. He has spotted numerous problems in a large number of research papers, and his findings have led to hundreds of retracted papers, due to both misconduct and mistakes. Even a leading medical journal has changed its practice after a few Carlisle’s discoveries.
Read morePosts
Most popular
- Best Electronic Lab Notebooks (ELN Reviews) in 2024December 13, 2023 - 8:00 am
- Best Single-cell RNA Sequencing Data Analysis SoftwareJanuary 3, 2022 - 8:46 am
- The Next Generation Of Antivenom Production Holds Many Possibilities For The FutureMarch 17, 2021 - 8:19 am
- Connected Laboratory & the Role of IoT in ScienceFebruary 4, 2020 - 4:02 pm
- The Importance of Better Digital Data Management in Laboratories and The FAIR FutureFebruary 4, 2020 - 3:06 pm
Tags
aging
animal
bacteria
brain
cancer
cell culture
Contamination
CRISPR
data
detection
diabetes
diagnostics
disease
dPCR
drug
Ebola
evolution
food
genome
Genomics
GMO
immune system
lab automation
laboratory
microorganisms
mutation
NGS
PCR
pipetting
plant
protein
qPCR
scientific project
scientific publication
SciNote
sequencing
space
stem cells
test
therapy
tumor
vaccine
virus
water
Zika